JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 18, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jose Dario Forero Fernandez Vs. Fiscal 4 Subunidad De Delitos Contra La Administracion Publica Barranquilla Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente contentivo de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Fiscal Cuarto de la Subunidad de Delitos contra la Administración Pública de la Fiscalía Seccional de Barranquilla y la Juez Primera Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, a la Corte Suprema de Justicia –Sala de Casación Penal-, para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitase a la Corte Suprema de Justicia -Sala de Casacion Penal-, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Jose Dario Forero FernandezJ,contra el Fiscal
  2. Cuarto. de la SubUnidad de Delitos contra la Administracion Publica de la Fiscalia Seccional de Barranquilla y la Juez Primera Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.